Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want. Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What’s your opinion
There are some moot points about pocket-money, which parent give to their children weekly, the question of the positive and the negative aspects of this action, has aroused as a subject of controversy among the authorities. Everyone has their own zeitgeist. When it comes to my position, I strongly subscribe to the viewpoint that gives weekly money to children is very positive. I have some reasons two of which will be aptly explicated hereunder.
The first reason worth discussing here is that the pocket-money leads to children to understand the value of the money. Lacking any money give rise to some trouble but having some money increase children confidence. It can very beneficial for children future due to understanding the value of money they know that gain the money is very difficult therefore they spend their money in a careful manner.
To be more specific, the more value of the money know, the more provident of the money expense. As a case od the point, I vividly remember when I was a child, my father gave me 50 rials I a week. Firstly I spent my pocket-money very soon but later after finishing my money, I decided to expense in the careful ways, therefore, I managed my payment after knowing that value. My personal experience competently corroborates the idea that pocket money could be very lucrative for children who don’t know the value of money and help to understand the value of that.
By the same token, another reason to be mentioned is that weekly currency, which gives by the parent, can be used in a beneficial way. Some parents learn their children to save a little of money for their future and tell them that saved money will have many advantages for them in the future thus, children Accustom to this action and save some money. This kind of money can be deposited in the bank and use ten years later, which is very beneficial for children. My personal example demonstrates this reality. When I was a young child, my mother opened the account for me in a bank, each month I saved some currency from my pocket-money and gave to my mother to deposit in that account consequently, after ten years I had the great number of deposits which help me to buy a car after I took my driving license. I notice that saving some of the payment from the pocket money is very significant for children future and I decide to do this action for my children. My own experience shed some light of the point that the pocket-money has very positive aspects which parent can learn to the children.
In the nutshell, giving weekly money to the children is very lucrative work from parent toward children. This kind of money not only give rise to children understand the value of money but also can save for their future.
- Compare and contrast your way of life with that of your parents. Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying to future generations? 70
- Which one do you prefer? Why?A company offering you a job with challenging and interesting projects but less vacation days or another company offering you a job that is not so challenging and interesting but has more vacation days. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities should give the same amount of money to their students sports activities as they give to their university libraries Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- TPO_43: Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or mee 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students do not respect teachers as much as they did in the past. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 380, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ficult therefore they spend their money in a careful manner. To be more specific, the more value o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: I_A[1]
Message: Did you mean 'am' (first person of "to be")?
Suggestion: am
...s a child, my father gave me 50 rials I a week. Firstly I spent my pocket-money v...
^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a beneficial way" with adverb for "beneficial"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... which gives by the parent, can be used in a beneficial way. Some parents learn their children to s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 833, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...y driving license. I notice that saving some of the payment from the pocket money is very s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, thus, kind of, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2261.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68115942029 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58746164344 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.422360248447 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 724.5 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7921969675 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.05 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.15 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337489607646 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140389120624 0.076458572812 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803623706987 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25271065192 0.150856017488 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677451613398 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.