Some people claim that not enough of wastes from homes is recycled They say that that only way to increase recycling for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste

Essay topics:

Some people claim that not enough of wastes from homes is recycled. They say that that only way to increase recycling for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Most people are aware that recycling is the best way to preserve our environment, however very few people exert the effort to do so. The pertinent question is what can make people to recycle their wastes appropriately? I completely agree that forming strict rules and regulations pertaining to waste management can result into efficient recycling and preserve our natural habitats.

Firstly, most people have ignored the damage that has already happened to our environment due to illegal dumping, burning of wastes and too much use of plastic. At the same time, we continue to mass produce plastic which does not decompose quickly. Due to lack of recycling, a lot of plastic is ending up in landfills which need to be stopped. A strict law can change the public attitude of irresponsible dumping and encourage reuse of such non bio-degradable substances.

Secondly, rules imposing monetary fines have been proven to be successful for keeping cities clean. For instance, the city-state of Singapore has imposed fines on spitting, illegal dumping and even eating chewing gums. The result speaks for itself; putting Singapore as one of the cleanest cities on earth. This illustrates the role of law and monetary fines in inculcating public discipline; which is required to deal with the problem of global warming and protecting our environment.

Lastly, all other measures like campaigns and awareness programs have failed to show the improvements. Despite of government’s campaigns, celebrity shows and messages on social media conveying the importance of recycling; there are many who still do not segregate wastes into degradable and non-degradable bins. When nothing else seems to work to encourage recycling, stricter rules & regulations can be imposed as a last resort to mandate recycling. Although, such laws could be challenging to implement initially, the ultimate goal of such protection is to safe guard the health of future generations.

In conclusion, it has been high time for us to react together as a society, as inappropriate dumping has caused enough damage to our land and the oceans. It is imperative, that governments consider stringent measures and introduce laws to protect the environment.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (9 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-23 Saritha Sreejesh 78 view
2019-03-12 Aimee Lee Lee 56 view
2019-06-18 Yasinunal 33 view
2019-05-02 el-naz 73 view
Essays by user veejay :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...warming and protecting our environment. Lastly, all other measures like campaign...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 498, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'implementing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: implementing
...lthough, such laws could be challenging to implement initially, the ultimate goal of such pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37142857143 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02429938974 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611428571429 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5994634694 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.588235294 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185682259377 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577357499613 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809142882958 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977412477528 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906273228218 0.056905535591 159% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.