It is true that we have more choices about our social network in these days. However, I disagree with the statement that people have too many choices now because people still have limmited freedom of choosing their jobs.
Campared with many years ago, we do have less restrictions about making friends. Firstly, the Internet provides us with many ways to communicate with our old friends, which could enhance our friendship. More than a face -to -face chat ,we could choose type a piece of massage to them or share our photos with then or have a video call with them, even if there is a long distant between us. At the same time, we are no longer restricted by our locations and we could exchange ideas with anyone on the Internet, which means that ordinary people have more chances to make friends with people from all kinds of background. While only people who are willing to travel around world had such oppotunities before.
However, people still face to many limmits when it comes to our jobs. Nowadays, the job application is so competitive that many people have to give in jobs that they are not instristed in. There are many factors that contribute to this fact. Firstly,many jobs require high level of professional skills so that not everyone who wants to apply the job could meet the requirements. For example, the artificial intellegent engineer could be a fascinating job for many young people, but in most cases, only graduates with strong computer science background could get the job offers. Besides, some professionals like firefighter are likely to be available to candicates who have an extremely strong body and I believe most people are not strong enough for that.
All in all, we have more choices about making friends but we still have many limmits in choosing jobs.
- in spite of advanced made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. why is this the case? what can be done about this problem 61
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- in spite of advanced made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. why is this the case? what can be done about this problem 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun restrictions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ampared with many years ago, we do have less restrictions about making friends. Firs...
^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...endship. More than a face -to -face chat ,we could choose type a piece of massage ...
^^
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...th people from all kinds of background. While only people who are willing to travel a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , many
...rs that contribute to this fact. Firstly,many jobs require high level of professional...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, then, while, for example, in most cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86319218241 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5110732073 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579804560261 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9473831126 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.642857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233554285354 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932184959889 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616824908294 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160835220789 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454735412987 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.