Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Technological advances have enabled human exploration of not only our galaxy but also the whole universe and opens up a chance of traveling to outer space as a service of tourism. As it is believed to be a promising area of tourism which brings myriad benefits to travellers, I am strongly convinced that the demerits may outweigh the merits.
It is a fallacy to consider space tourism as a feasible way to broaden our knowledge about the universe. Advocates of such view may argue that such direct personal experiences would be the driving force for finding further mysteries of the space rather than observing it through the astronomical telescope. However, this kind of experiences is only efficient for space scientists and astronauts since they have sufficient knowledge to understand the dynamics of the planets or even more incredibly – other universes. This means that such ordinary people would not have the capability to study the space but simply enjoy it as a sight-seeing trip. It is open to the question whether passenger of such service could apply what they learn from the journey to their daily working life. The answer may be varied, but I doubt that only a few space-related professionals could say yes.
On the other hand, I am more of the opinion that space tourism would exert huge negative impact on the environment of the planet Earth. Every time an aircraft is launched into the space, it releases an abundant amount of exhaust fumes which equals hundreds of in-use vehicles doing simultaneously. Considering that in our alerting air-contaminated situation, launching aircrafts for the purpose of tourism would do nothing but exacerbate the greenhouse effect. Additionally, the ozone layer surrounding our planet as a protection against the harmful rays of the sun would be damaged by constant launches of spacecraft, and as a predictable result, the living condition in the earth might be worse than ever.
In conclusion, while space travelling could equip human-being with knowledge about the uncovered universes, it could not bring benefits to the general populace. My firm belief is that outer-space trips would do more harm to our atmosphere.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-08 | Albert Armin | 89 | view |
- the maps below show Hunderstone Town at present and a proposed plan for it 87
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 84
- : sport is a big business, with high earnings for professional sports people and a lot of companies involved both financially and other ways. Is it a negative or positive development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...t as a sight-seeing trip. It is open to the question whether passenger of such service could apply w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, while, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15774647887 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94218036708 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585915492958 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.5499032272 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.785714286 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24138212772 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846929679052 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305550515959 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148287690109 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199826523944 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.