If voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what conclusions can we draw about “The nature of democracy”?
Recently, the phenomenon of compulsory voting and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the nature of democracy can be a plus, and I will discuss conclusions of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, compulsory voting can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, compulsory voting might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical learning could relate to this reality that the demerits of a laboratory experiment pertain to the intellectual development. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of compulsory voting far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-27 | moprhius12 | 77 | view |
| 2018-12-27 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
- Many people think regions affect successful persons. What is your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to? 85
- Younger employees have more skills, knowledge and more motivated than older employees. To what extent do you agree or disagree, support your argument with your own experience? 88
- sports, plating in a team or individual? what are the reviews and possible solutions for that? discuss. 88
- extreme sports 88
- Should digital media replace textbooks? what are the reviews and possible solutions. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84496124031 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33731509074 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647286821705 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6817198328 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118863260612 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416388716921 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484006975203 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0696472776968 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357325577555 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.