Indiscriminate killing of wildlife and destruction of their natural habitat is eliminating many species from the world. Should governments enact more serious laws and enforce them to protect the wildlife?
Indiscriminate killing of animals have already put many animals to extinction or near extinction. Destruction of natural habitat adds to the misery of the animals and many are forced to leave their dens for unsafe living. Displacement is often accompanied by scarcity of food and enhanced danger of being hunted. These displaced animals are exposed to many new dangers by man and other predator animals. I definitely support the proposition that government should enact more strict laws to protect wildlife.
Many animals die of starvation due to draught, winter and natural calamities. Their decline has been accelerated by the destruction of their feeding and nesting places, by the collection of their eggs, and above all by the widespread use of chemicals and pesticides which enter their food chains leading to sterility and mass deaths. Hunting of birds and animals is another cause of their extinction.
In fact, indiscriminate killing of animals have already put many animal species to extinction or near extinction. Destruction of their natural habitats adds to the misery of animals forced to leave their dens for unsafe living. Displacement is often accompanied by scarcity of food and enhanced danger of being hunted. These displaced animals are exposed to many new dangers posed by man and other predators.
Many scientists and researchers have studied wildlife extinction and its effects. Animals and other living species are very important for our ecological balance. Animal species maintain a systematic balance in the wilderness, elimination of a number of species from the system may result in the systems atrophy. Therefore this will lead to the loss of ecological balance of planet earth and ultimately human civilizations will stop flourishing.
Awareness campaign and laws against killing, selling and trading will help to protect wildlife. For example, conservationist campaigns in the west throughout the 1980's have effectively reduced the use of expensive fashionable fur jackets once popular among women. In the face of international criticism, Japan government has banned whale killing and selling of its meat. Our government should not only enact rules to stop killing of animals, but also ban illegal trading of animals' meat, skin and tasks. The law should be enforced strictly while conservationist organizations can be used as ally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-28 | tahmeed1993 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that the amount of money spent on libraries is a waste as new technologies are developing and replacing library functions. Do you agree or disagree. 67
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Parents are the best teachers for their children. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- In many cities there is little control on the design and construction of new houses Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas Do the advantages 45
- There is no longer enough natural resources to sustain current levels of economic growth To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...stem may result in the systems atrophy. Therefore this will lead to the loss of ecologica...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2009.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93757687431 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509485094851 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.332518123 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95238095238 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281224753336 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774714666717 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595454307488 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147687130112 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375947587076 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.