Some people claim that a country is likely to be economically successful is its system allows people to dedicate a longer time on working. Although I fairly agree that the amount of time is not a primary factor that contributes to economic prosperity, this essay will discuss and examine both points of view.
A longer working time produces a better outcome. The number of people believe that by putting more time performing somethings, the final result will be satisfactory. In other words, if a country has a system encouraging people to work longer, these people will definitely spend extra time optimize their country in a certain way involving economic development as a part of their job. For instance, Japanese people always work overtime to not only accumulate money for their individual family but also to reinforce their nation.
In contrast, some people and I argue that quality is a determining factor, not time. Even though spending more time developing the country’s economy is vital, without a sufficient amount of quality and effort, it is completely useless. A good way of illustrating this is that if a businessman spends his whole day at his office but doing nothing, the company will not benefit from his time. Compared to another employee who always performs a 100 percent on his tasks. Even if he spends just half a day on working, is company will inevitably enhance by his diligence and his time.
To conclude, some people perceive that countries with a system that permits their people working longer will achieve more economic success. However, in my opinion, the countries with people having better talents and qualification will process economic superiority.
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 58
- In countries where unemployment is high, education should only be obligatory up to primary school and not secondary school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart shows the average life expectancy for males and females in 1900, 1950 and 1990 67
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- As countries develop, people tend to buy more and more cars. Do you thing the advantages for the individual outweigh the disadvantages for the environment? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for instance, in contrast, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14079422383 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78776574379 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5559566787 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0021132182 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.538461538 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253627651237 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998851025523 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546159485265 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165344638251 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330845417882 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.