TPO 19- Advertisement buzzing
In both reading material and lecturer are mostly talking about new tactic which named "buzz". Each of points in the reading has a serious downside. However, the lecturer man supports buzzing advertisement is trustworthy.
First of all, some critics complain products are paid praises. The writer states that if the people know the truth of product which used too much praises, they would not believe it again. However, the lecturer shares his experience and states when he was working in company for a part-time job, company requires the employee tell the truth. Therefore, there is no way to advertise the praise about product.
Secondly, the author mentions that costumers do not listen the buzzers more critically that washes their brain without any suspects of product. For example, most digital advertisement and newspapers written in the title "new and improved" product. But, the lecturer opposes this idea. Instead he mentions when he was working as a company service, buzzers have to answer the questions correctly that consumers asked. For example, sometimes he did not answer the question exactly such as "how long consumers use it product?" because he do not know about the consumers common using?
Finally, the man strongly refutes the writer's point is that ruining the social civilization. As he says buzzers more responsible people because their important rule is that tell the truth. As well as, they conduct many people that make them more honest and open-minded buzzers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...now the truth of product which used too much praises, they would not believe it agai...
^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...t. But, the lecturer opposes this idea. Instead he mentions when he was working as a co...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...sumers use it product?' because he do not know about the consumers common usi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, talking about, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77032890145 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8830950278 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276597829344 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863078563864 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542594401635 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150229638113 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516243030768 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.