Written complaints had to be expected, as a change in a regular quotidian abitude is due to prompt indignation, though those have to be taken with an understanding ear without going immediately out of the way for simpathetic reasons.
The content clients have remained silent, so there's no proof of the new ratio of happy and unhappy listeners, unless the listeners number is available, which is not mentioned by the writer of the paragraph.
Even though American folk music hasn't been cancelled but diminished, it could still represent a problem for the abitual listeners, but instead of modifying again the program to the one before, it could be modified to play AFM during the hours of highest frequency, or at least during the complainers requiered hours, and the Latino & world music in the remaining time. The options could be quite a few when having to satisfy both parties.
The autor doesn't mention if there were complaints by the Latino & world music fans before the first decision of changing the program, so there's no way to know if this need to reach more fans was based on any criteria. In addition, the loss of listeners-supporters doesn't have to be a negative factor. As mentioned in the first paragraph, it had to be expected, and expected to be overlapped by the supposedly L&WM fans that could arrive in bigger masses. Since no deep marketing and social research is mentioned to have taken place, chances are that it actually happened and no one at the Folk on the Air program has noticed.
Despite the flaws in this argument, the writer could be right about the steps taken by the Folk on the Air staff, though proof would have to be presented in order to hold a valid argument.
- For the past year, as part of an effort to broaden our supporter base, our Folk on the Air program has allocated less time to traditional American folk music and more time to Latino music and world music. In recent months, many long-term supporters of our 43
- A true university education encompasses far more than the narrow, specialized study of a single discipline. Only through exploring the broad spectrum of liberal arts courses can students become truly learned. 50
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: Written complaints had to be expected, as a change in a regular quotidian abitude is due to prompt indignation, though those have to be taken with an understanding ear without going immediately out of the way for simpathetic reasons.
Error: quotidian Suggestion: quotation
Error: abitude Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: simpathetic Suggestion: sympathetic
Sentence: Even though American folk music hasn't been cancelled but diminished, it could still represent a problem for the abitual listeners, but instead of modifying again the program to the one before, it could be modified to play AFM during the hours of highest frequency, or at least during the complainers requiered hours, and the Latino & world music in the remaining time.
Error: requiered Suggestion: required
Error: abitual Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: The autor doesn't mention if there were complaints by the Latino & world music fans before the first decision of changing the program, so there's no way to know if this need to reach more fans was based on any criteria.
Error: autor Suggestion: No alternate word
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 9 15
No. of Words: 299 350
No. of Characters: 1371 1500
No. of Different Words: 166 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.158 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.585 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.639 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 91 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 69 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 45 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 33.222 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.919 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.4 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.658 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.061 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 46, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...ontent clients have remained silent, so theres no proof of the new ratio of happy and ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...graph. Even though American folk music hasnt been cancelled but diminished, it could...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the highest'.
Suggestion: of the highest
...e modified to play AFM during the hours of highest frequency, or at least during the compl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ing to satisfy both parties. The autor doesnt mention if there were complaints by the...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...st decision of changing the program, so theres no way to know if this need to reach mo...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 264, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ition, the loss of listeners-supporters doesnt have to be a negative factor. As mentio...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, so, still, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 28.8173652695 31% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 2260.96107784 62% => OK
No of words: 295.0 441.139720559 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76610169492 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73246792873 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 204.123752495 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569491525424 0.468620217663 122% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 705.55239521 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.3546639367 57.8364921388 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.222222222 119.503703932 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7777777778 23.324526521 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.70786347227 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139770192641 0.218282227539 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526285294898 0.0743258471296 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566235173616 0.0701772020484 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662426272455 0.128457276422 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05669280251 0.0628817314937 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.3799401198 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.3550499002 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 98.500998004 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.