Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some people believe it is a good thing while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The extraordinary advancement of science will make it possible for human to live up to 100 or 200 years. One school of thought believes this development would be a positive thing, while the opposing belief contends the opposite. I disagree with those who believe that an increase in life span is positive.
Disbeliever of the stated view believe that quality of life has more preference to the quantitative span of life. If someone lives for 200 years, but has cancer or arthritis, their life is not better than a person who lived a healthy and happy life of 75 years, for example. Another popular argument is that artificially increasing the life span of humans would result in a massive ecological imbalance, directly affecting the demographics and food security of the world. People also think that increased life spans would create a negative environment for the newly born humans, as there would not be enough resources in the world to feed a imbalanced population.
People who think that increased life span of 100-200 as a result of scientific progress believe that move years in life will give a chance to every person to fulfill his dreams which are not possible to make in 70-80 years. A 200-year life, for instance, will let a person try a variety of things. They will get several chances to change their discourse in life. They will also get to spend more time with their family and successive generations. A longer life will help humanity progress more quickly, as we will get a chance to help from geniuses, scientists and scholars for a longer period.
My opinion is that a longer span of life is not a positive thing. A normal life span infuses in us an urgency to live in the present moment. We cannot waste our years, as we have constant reminder of death in our self. A 100 or 200-year life will be of low quality. Humans will become a burden for our future generations and the circle of life designed by the evolutionary process will get disturbed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-05 | bhk1987 | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | 09bitrkhan | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | 09bitrkhan | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | 09bitrkhan | 78 | view |
- Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some people believe it is a good thing while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some people believe it is a good thing while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some people believe it is a good thing while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 639, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e enough resources in the world to feed a imbalanced population. People who thi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72173913043 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63677958792 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524637681159 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3888763158 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8235294118 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76470588235 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188796072114 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072251701188 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065760048721 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13727161408 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522328552454 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.