The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words.

Submitted by S.Mohsen on Mon, 01/14/2019 - 12:22

The line graph gives information about how much fish and meat have been consumed in a special country in Europe from 1979 to 2004.
As can be seen from the graph the consumption of all the products decreased except the chicken experienced a significant increase in the whole period.
The consumption of beef was nearly 220 grams per person per week in 1979 while it fell sharply to just over 100 grams in 2004. In addition the changes for lamb was as similar as beef, while reached at almost 60 grams per person per week.
Out of the four products, the largest consumption of fish and some kinds of meat went on chicken. It can be seen that there was a dramatic increase to just under 250 grams per person per week in 2004.
The trend of fish in the whole period declined slightly by approximately 30 grams per person per week and also it levelled out in comparison to other products.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...al country in Europe from 1979 to 2004. As can be seen from the graph the consumpt...
^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...rply to just over 100 grams in 2004. In addition the changes for lamb was as similar as ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 727.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48765432099 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41635721652 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561728395062 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8594769996 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134988761554 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747561037598 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573878475434 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861865967042 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544672877466 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.