Students at schools are at the impressionable age and the two most influences are their teachers and parents. While it is true that the former are ones who impart their knowledge to their students, I also agree that children’ social behaviors are significantly influenced by their fathers and mothers.
In terms of intellectual development, school teachers play a primary part in its progress. Dedicated teachers exert a greater influence on their students on their subject areas. School children are far more enthusiastic in studying if their teachers have a great teaching method and knowledge resources. In fact, some people owe their lifelong love of a subject to passionate teachers who taught them in secondary school. Besides, parents can reinforce their children passion for studying by assisting them in doing homework or buying reference books.
From the social growth perspective, parental influence is undoubtedly stronger. Firstly, they are ones who their children spend most of the time with; therefore, they have more opportunities to teach and train their children behavior and social etiquette. Only by spending time playing, talking and observing their children can parents understand them and guide them in the right way to become good citizens. Secondly, parents are considered role models and almost their every action is imitated. For example, parents’ attitude towards the elderly, eating etiquette in restaurants and social communication are monitored and copied by their children.
From all the above-mentioned, although teachers have the greatest impact on stimulating their students' studying progress, parental influence on the development of children is stronger in social situations. Both teachers and parents have to behave morally in order to educate the next generation to become good citizens for the future world.
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 78
- The chart below shows how frequency people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 74
- The table below describes the proportion of smokers in males and females between the age of 15 and 20 in Britain 65
- Topic: Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62765957447 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96240251834 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567375886525 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4837217814 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.357142857 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491803748576 0.244688304435 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181261370515 0.084324248473 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849897790751 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319162506409 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627996141368 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.