The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree?

Nowadays, it is impossible to deny the fact that both sciences and non-science subjects play crucial part in our society, whether governments should allocate more funds to science subjects has sparked a heated debate. In my opinion, I am inclined to believe that sciences are the core elements of a society and every other subject can only progress on the wings of sciences, and I will elaborate in the following essay.

To begin with, science subjects train students critical thinking with questions related to technology, environment and medicine. For instance, by studying sciences subjects, scientists and engineers have designed and developed technologies on internet and smart phones. Doctors and researchers also have innovated and discovered new medicines for cancer and long-term diseases. Hence, sciences have contributed to globalization and improved human’s life. Without sciences, information and ideas are hard to get across between nations and individuals, and large number of people will suffer from cancer and long-term diseases. As a result, governments should invest more funds in technology development and medical research projects.

Furthermore, another reason making sciences more important than other subjects is that it increased productivity. The advanced machines and manufacturing processes developed by engineers and scientists were found to increase 70% of the productivity in China in the last decade according to one of the studies done by University of New South Wales. Therefore, sciences boosted productivity of a nation and ultimately lead to economic growth.

In conclusion, governments must allocate more funds to technology, medicine and research related subjects as they increase productivity and improve everyone’s living standards. At the same time, policies which encouraging those studies should be made and promoted in local schools and universities.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82206405694 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1086056008 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622775800712 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8515950406 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.846153846 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283097455915 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927484256186 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764634113024 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162477443709 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517893251485 0.056905535591 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.