It has been suggested that learning foreign language at primary schools creates more benefits to children rather than involving at secondary ones. However, learning a foreign language at secondary schools always have been dominated traditionally. In my conviction, adopting foreign languages at beginner educational schools can set with both positive and negative outcomes.
The obvious argument in its favor is that, children learn language without any difficulties due to set up program which still acquires their mother tongue. During the speaking in foreign language to them, they accept that language as their second native language and start practicing it at school to communicate with friends and with teacher also. Moreover, teaching period among children go easily and clearly which adolescents always come with misunderstandings, difficulties and accepting properly.
Another point to consider is that, learning of foreign language in childhood exempt from one load which has to be learnt at secondary school. While they finished primary level by knowing well that language, the only special subjects which help in later future will be in the center of the attention. Furthermore, educating another language in young age creates potential of learning another foreign language without difficulties and therefore quick adaptation to other culture.
There are, however, some disadvantages. Primary teachers are generalists, and may not have language skills themselves. If government provides special language teachers, it will cost a lot and can impact on education economy. Furthermore, much attention will be given to primary schools and assigned the major part of budget to them than other educations. However, these issues cannot be compulsory reasons to stop this policy from adopting.
All points considered, while there are both convincing arguments on both sides, learning foreign language in childhood benefits to growing generation even it heavily pressure to economy. I reckon that, adopting this policy can bring about only advantage to education system and future of children.
- In many countries today, parents are able to choose to send their children to single-sex schools or co-educational schools. Some people think that children going to single-sex schools have disadvantages later in life.To what extent do you agree? 49
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction .do you agree or disagree? 84
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 78
- The line graph shows the channel one news viewing figures per day in 2015 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have always been
...a foreign language at secondary schools always have been dominated traditionally. In my convicti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 343, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...mmunicate with friends and with teacher also. Moreover, teaching period among childr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ducation system and future of children.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, as to, i reckon
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6974522293 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84967789834 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585987261146 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5728030058 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8125 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342271370044 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115496918189 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942163087767 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190143298361 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0970663836772 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.