Recently, there has been a significant push towards learning practical skills. This trend has many advantages such as the ability to gain hands-on experience as well as disadvantages, namely the inability of some to learn without the use if text based methods. Both the benefits and drawbacks will be discussed hereafter.
The benefits of learning practical skills are numerous. firstly, it allows the learners to gain real experience by actually performing a task. While anyone is capable of reading how to repair an engine, it is not until a person has physically performed the feat that they can truly understand all of the intricacies involved. Secondly, acquiring a practical skill set makes an individual well-rounded. They are likely to handle unforeseen problems which had not been mentioned in written forms. Finally, hands-on experience, or at the very least experience, is highly sought after by employers. No longer are companies willing to waste parts of their budgets on training when they stipulate that they require potential workers to already possess practical skills.
On the other hand, relying only on skills of a practical nature presents many drawbacks. To begin with, many students who have never been subject to anything but theoretical knowledge may be unable to new concepts without first reading about them. In addition, many schools are incapable of providing a hands-on skill set due to a lack of facilities or an already over-stretched budget. Moreover, changing from text-based learning to practical methodology places undue stress upon an administrator. Teachers must be constantly up to date with advancements in their fields' and have the capabilities to perform or recreate new findings or methods flawlessly.
In conclusion, the aforementioned pros and cons display that there are many strengths and weaknesses associated with educational facilities devoting more time and resources toward the implementation of empirical knowledge. Personally, while many students do lack this type of skill set, they would be unable to succeed unless it was taught in conjunction with theoretical knowledge.
- You are a secretary, planning a corporate event. Write a letter to Entertainment Company explaining the kind of party you would like to organize, indicate the date and time of the event and your special requests. 56
- some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 56
- some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 87
- There have been some problems with public transportation in your area recently.Write a letter to the management of the public transport company. In your letterdescribe the problemsexplain how these problems are affecting the publicsuggest some changes tha 89
- Your local council is considering closing a sport and leisure center that it runs, in order to save moneyWrite a letter to the local council, in your letter,Give details of how you and your friends or family use the center.Explain why the center is import 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...learning practical skills are numerous. firstly, it allows the learners to gain real ex...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...the feat that they can truly understand all of the intricacies involved. Secondly, acquiri...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47878787879 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05078532394 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630303030303 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3558751078 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.352941176 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2941176471 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151494991351 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479060800548 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039457421505 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905674405375 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296420482902 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.