Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
"we should pay attention to the opinions of famous people."
Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Famous people are usually drawn the most attentions among the people. They are famous because of their abilities or talents in specific fields and It's a mistake to assume them as people who have broad and correct knowledge in every subject. I am going to support this opinion by two reasons. First, famous people are like others. Therefore, they do not always have expert opinions in all areas. Second, some of them have a connection with government, special corporation or organization that leads their opinions.
First of all, We must recognize that celebrities are famous for their particular work and profession. They just did not have the ability to reach that position, while they also worked or studied hard for these positions that they have possessed, but it is considerable that they just have knowledge in particular issues which are related to their professions. If we consider we can trust on their opinion in various issues, it may lead us to difficult situations.
Additionally, Some celebrities are linked to specific institutions or government as their popular face to attract the views and opinions of the people in pursuit of their goals. For instance, some of the presidential candidates use the famous person to draw attention. That famous person would give positive opinion about that candidate, while the people's perspective is different for choosing a president that the candidate may not conform to a wide range of people's views, so we should not follow every opinions that come from famous people.
In conclusion, famous people celebrities do not have expert opinions on various topics, and their opinions may be related to their particular connections. According to these reasons It's not logical to follow their opinions on every subjects and issues. We can just follow their opinions in their proficient fields.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?"we should pay attention to the opinions of famous people."Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ities or talents in specific fields and Its a mistake to assume them as people who ...
^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n pursuit of their goals. For instance, some of the presidential candidates use the famous ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...opinion about that candidate, while the peoples perspective is different for choosing a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17056856187 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74734049175 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52508361204 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4971142486 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.066666667 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201018956589 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831863661893 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494574689377 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137485539076 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544948208597 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.