The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
The graphs below depict the computer ownership during 2002 to 2010 as a percentage of total population and computer possession categorized by education level.
The percentage of people owning the computer saw a steady increasing trend over the period of 2002 to 2010. In 2002, around 55% of the total population possessed a computer, while in 2010, almost three-fourth of the people had it. The years 2004, 2006 and 2008 witnessed 60%, 65% and 70% of the population having a computer.
In 2002, the percentage of people having a computer holding no high school diploma was 15%, which more than doubled in 2010, to become 42.5%. High school graduates also increase their share in computer ownership by nearly two folds from 35% in 2002 to around 70% in 2010. The postgraduates were the highest percentage of computer owners with 75% possessing it in 2002 and 95% of them owing it in 2010.
In conclusion, there was a gradual increase in the percentage of computer owners, during the given time period, irrespective of the educational status of the people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-06 | ross_diadame | 84 | view |
- The table below show the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two period. 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 73
- The table below gives information on the gender marital status and age of employees working in retail and manufacturing industries of a country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevantexamples from yo 89
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 61
Comments
Hi, your writing inputs are
Hi, your writing inputs are awesome, can you share tips and strategies especially with task two, im really struggling to get a score of 7 and i will be taking by end of next month.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97752808989 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75656702896 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.6163657558 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.75 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429971684367 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198642257981 0.103423049105 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110877517997 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274352223061 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130092280133 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.