Transportation nawadays play an essential role in our life and cars are the most important part of it. Almost all of all of us, directly or indirectly use automobiles every day. Cars usage is not only for privet journies, but also for several other applications in public transportation, products delivery, industries, cargoes and so on. If I want to answer the question where in the next twenty years there were fewer cars than are today, though many may be agree with the idea, others would disagree. In my view, in the next twenty years we have more cars in the plannet for two important reasons.
The main reason is that there are several undeveloped and under development countries that are even at the beggining or middel of the car usage and production. Even though the human's technology is growing fast and such thechs like IT comunications, computers usage, IoT are going to replace the common transportation, but uncivilised nations have not the money for this change. For example when I was in Moscow during my doctoral studies, I found that IT technologies are very common in people's day life. They could perform lots of thing even their job remotely without real transfortation. Such beussinesseis like internet magazines were play an important role in their life. Some month ago I have traved to africa. People there were poor and in some regeons even there were not pure water for drinking. Cars tech were old and internet speed was some thing near zero. As you can see, even though in developed places may be virtual transportaion is growing, but in some others threr are very low speed development and new thechs is not going to replace cars.
Another reason is that new technology development rate is not enough to ignor cars in future decades. scientific achivements in both IT and automobile industries are good but not sufficient. For instance, I have seen meny new fantastic techs when I was in Moscow. Even one of them can revolutes our future life but as I saw in my researches during several years in Russia and other foreign countries, using traditional techs is already continuing. My studies taught me that there is a very grate new tech is needed for ignoring automobils.
In sum, cars for the next twenty years will be used more and more. Our tech and mony is not enough.
- TPO ind 4 3
- TPO11Independant Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed damaged by human activity Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live What is your opinion Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO 3 integrated 3
- TPO 3 Integrated Essay 3
- TPO ind 4 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'all of'.
Suggestion: all of
...e the most important part of it. Almost all of all of us, directly or indirectly use automobi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 448, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
... were fewer cars than are today, though many may be agree with the idea, others would di...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...velopment countries that are even at the beggining or middel of the car usage and...
^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...r usage and production. Even though the humans technology is growing fast and such the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of things'.
Suggestion: lots of things
...in peoples day life. They could perform lots of thing even their job remotely without real tr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nternet magazines were play an important role in their life. Some month ago I hav...
^^
Line 3, column 850, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
...rs tech were old and internet speed was some thing near zero. As you can see, even though ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Scientific
...enough to ignor cars in future decades. scientific achivements in both IT and automobile i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80653266332 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71562480199 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540201005025 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7494402252 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0952380952 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9523809524 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90476190476 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.