There has been myriad of evidence that Science and Technology is the most prominent subject in school for last few years. Number of people believes that technological subject are more important than historical subjects, also there are some individuals who have tendency to history more than science and technology. In the following I want to evaluate both side of view.
First of all it an undeniable that reading historical subjects is the best method to learn beneficial concepts, in the other word by History you can avoid to experience detrimental way of living. Moreover, the charismatic characters are chosen by civil people which is the most distinguished impact for the societies. On the other hand, people in every country could familiar with whit their ancient culture and predict their destination, in some way.
Secondly, I would content that Technology is one of the inseparable matter for the time being. I feel we should view to all of it benefits for human being. Without developing science and technology our society might be dropped down many years ago, also, we would not able to find any clue of the past years. By using up to dated devices for discovering signs of the past creatures we can enhance our knowledge about the historical events.
By the way of conclusion and considering above mentioned, I believe that Science and technology is kind of part and parcel matters for nowadays people. If governments give more attention to historical subjects History will be disappeared gradually and I think the science will be more important in the future.
- Some people argue that strict punishment for driving offenses is the only effective way toward improving safety on the road. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 78
- Some people think that there are now too many cars on the roads, and they are spoiling ourtowns and cities.Do you agree or disagree? 11
- The graph below shows cinema attendance by age in Great Britain 48
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, i feel, i think, kind of, by the way, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04980842912 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7867394085 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593869731801 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6447697718 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.833333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284408443589 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925940723543 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084096266012 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173503709455 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109947239676 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.