The pie charts indicate the proportion of British students studing at a university in the UK who could speak languages other than mother tongue in 2000 and 2010 in 6 categories(No other language, french only, german only, spanish only, another language and two other languages).
Overall, the category that remained as the highest proportion from 2000 and 2010 was spanish only, while the second largest proportion that students were able to use was changed from no other language in 2000 to another language in 2010.
The proportion of students who can speak only spanish increased from 30% in 2000 to 35% in 2010 as constantly recorded as the most overwhelming category among 6 categories. Likewise, another language and two other languages showed similar trend that increasing by 5% to 20% and 15% respectively in 2010.
On the other hand, students who cannot speack other language decreased by 10% from 20% in 2000 to 10% in 2010, which accounted for the second highest proportion in 2000 but not in 2010. The category of french only also fell over by 5% throughout the period.
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss bọth views and give your own opinion. 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, likewise, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 26.3917525773 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 937.175257732 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 206.0 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99450549451 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63510090749 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 127.690721649 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.622605031667 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 290.88556701 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 16.3608247423 183% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.984450932 44.8134815571 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.5 76.5299724578 198% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 16.8248392259 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 4.34317383033 219% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329856189467 0.216113520407 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164800931019 0.0766984524023 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857222165759 0.0603063233224 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218310189076 0.12726935374 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312847146093 0.0580467560999 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 8.37731958763 205% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 70.7449484536 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 7.45979381443 169% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 8.71597938144 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 41.2886597938 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 8.62886597938 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 8.54432989691 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 8.15463917526 221% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.