Which way do you prefer to spend time: with a small number of close friends or with many friends?
Compare these two views.
People with different behavioral traits have different preferences of the groups of friends they want to hang out with. This essay chalk out the difference between people who prefer to be with larger groups versus the ones who prefer smaller groups of friends.
One of the many benefits of being with close friends is not only can you share your happiness with them but also your troubles and grief. They have been with you through your thick and thin and hence know how to handle you at the time of trouble. For instance, my brother, who is an Introvert by nature, would never prefer being with larger groups as he would not want to intrude into his privacy and would not be comfortable sharing his space with a lot of people.
On one hand your close friends understand the ‘in and out’ of you, however, being with larger group of friends give you the benefit of doing a lot of group activities/parties that won’t be possible with fewer people. There would always be someone available for you when you need him or her. On the contrary to my brother’s preference, I, being an Extrovert, always choose to be with a lot of friends as it gives me the chance to connect with different people having different mindsets and perceptions.
Although both the scenarios have their own advantages, it totally depends upon the person and his or her choice to hang out with friends. Rather than considering the number of friends you have, comfort of sharing your personal space and time should be considered as important.
- Which way do you prefer to spend time: with a small number of close friends or with many friends?Compare these two views. 67
- Consumers nowadays are faced with increased advertising from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by these advertisements? What measures can be taken to tackle this issue. 56
- The position of women in society has changed markedly in the last twentyyears. Many of the problems young people now experience, such as juveniledelinquency, arise from the fact that many married women now work and are not at home to care for their childr 84
- Consumers nowadays are faced with increased advertising from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by these advertisements? What measures can be taken to tackle this issue 73
- Some countries spend a lot of money to make bicycle usage easier. Why is this? Is this the best solution to traffic congestion? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81132075472 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58189881583 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539622641509 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6189479937 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295903305286 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138502931494 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651513113072 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192918145424 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410014729805 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.