Bad and goods of eco-certified wood.
Well, the first argument that the lecture defies the reading it is about the fact that the reading says that American consumers would not pay attention to the advertising of eco-certified wood, the lecture makes the point that consumers that care about environmental causes would definitely care about such ads.
The second argument made by the reading is that consumers would not be happy either willing to pay higher prices for eco-certified wood, citing that the consumers have the prices as one of the main factors put into the account in a purchase, the lecture makes it clear that price is indeed an important factor, but only if there is a big difference between two products, if such a difference is minimal, it does not end up affecting the consumer behaviour, their decision to buy or not something. As was the case with eco-certified wood which is said by the lecture of nor being very much more expensive than ordinary wood. And lastly, comes the argument by the reading, stating that it would only make sense to invest on eco-certified wood if Americans companies were to sell abroad, given that fact that internally, where most of the national production of wood is consumed, that would be useless, given the current satisfaction of the American consumers with its products, the lecture would be against this argument, saying that not caring about this international trend of greater care for environmental causes would put at risk the America companies that would be replaced by the foreign companies selling eco-certified products to an ever-increasing public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-06 | Davi Soares Alves | 76 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, second, so, well, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04597701149 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82410047947 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528735632184 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 65.0 21.2450331126 306% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 193.09194701 49.2860985944 392% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 329.25 110.228320801 299% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 65.25 21.698381199 301% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.25 7.06452816374 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.09492273731 49% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206906549311 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155964567306 0.0996497079465 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635598503357 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163773934578 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463232352405 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 35.0 13.3589403974 262% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 5.5 53.8541721854 10% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 5.55761589404 263% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 28.6 11.0289183223 259% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.9 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 10.7273730684 266% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 28.0 10.498013245 267% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 29.0 11.2008830022 259% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.