The pie charts below show online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the information about Internet buying sales for retail parts in New Zealand in the year 2003 and 2013.
Overall, at the beginning of the period, the travel sector was the most significant of online shopping, while books were the least portion of internet buying for retail sectors. In comparison, at the end of the time, books and film/music sales were rose, meanwhile, travel and clothes sales dwindled.
Firstly, concerning online clothes sales in New Zealand, in 2003, 24% of online sales for retail sectors, and its slump to 16% in 2013. Similarly, the travel sector was 36% of internet sales for retail sectors in 2003, and in 2013, it sank to 29%.
On the other hand, online sales of film/music were 21% in 2003 in New Zealand, and in 2013, it was a dramatic shift to almost one-third, and this was strikingly for retail sectors. Moreover, 19% part of internet books sales in 2003, and it was enhanced by 3% in 2013.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-01-08 | RazzaqovAmir | view |
- "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies 23
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district. 56
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 25
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, similarly, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75903614458 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.448185656 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475903614458 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5749836395 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.857142857 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345129835424 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193028929411 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947884669399 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252873179028 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961760592215 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.