“Some experts opine that a new language should be introduced for all countries for international communication.”
Do you think the benefits of introducing a new international language will outweigh the problems?
Technology, globalization, enhanced tourism facilities and open trade policy have brought nations together and some people dream to have a world with no cultural barriers and boundaries. The expert opinion of having a new single international language for all nations thus has formed and despite its appeal, I believe that it would be a futile step as the world already has an international language- English.
The increasing conglomeration of nations, upsurge of globalisation and a widespread use of modern technology have tremendously increased people’s need to communicate with others and thus some linguistics express their view of introducing a new global language. However, the real picture is quite different than the expectation as linguistics have already failed to establish an artificially formed universal language despite their efforts and arguments. English, the most widely used language for international communication is already in place and has a quite reach features. Besides, a large number of people use other international languages like Spanish and French and except some proud and culturally biased people, all have accepted English as their mean to communicate people from other countries. This model is already working pretty well and the idea of patching an already functional system would add more distresses.
Over the last millennia, English as an international language has already infiltrated the territories due to geopolitical reasons and cultural encouragements. A language is not merely a collection of letters and words; rather it is a result of the evolution of society, constant research and experience of mass people. Thus no matter how easy the newly introduced language is made, it will lack the fundamental quality of a rich language. People in favour of presenting a new global language often opine that the new language would be culturally neutral and morally correct to be the common linguistic ground for still divided humanity. As fair as it may sound, such opinion lacks rationality. English is already doing fine and inventing a new language and having it functional would bring unnecessary distress and effort and it will more likely to fail as it did in the past.
To conclude, the world needs a unified language for many reasons but introducing a new one is the least ideal solution to that. The natural flow of English as a global language has already filled the gap and we no longer need to add unnecessary misery to people to experiment a seemingly ineffective idea.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 73 | view |
- Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects, instead of some specific subjects.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint? 61
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
- Some people believe that there is a reduction in air travel in the future. Do you think this trend as positive or negative development? 84
- The food travels thousands of miles from farm to consumer. Some people think it would be better to our environment and economy if people only ate only locally produced food. What extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television However television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today To what extent do you agree with this statement 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...er, the real picture is quite different than the expectation as linguistics have alr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('quite') instead an adjective, or a noun ('reach') instead of another adjective.
...mmunication is already in place and has a quite reach features. Besides, a large number of pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nd has a quite reach features. Besides, a large number of people use other international language...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...research and experience of mass people. Thus no matter how easy the newly introduced...
^^^^
Line 5, column 878, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e likely to fail as it did in the past. To conclude, the world needs a unified l...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3184079602 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07277875191 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532338308458 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 687.6 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.897020214 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.533333333 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291738426154 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100905458683 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859350147361 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188652654406 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497084491747 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.78957915832 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.