Is it wise for an industry to replace its experienced but old workers with new and young individuals who have less experience?
It is true that a recent trend of replacing the experienced old workers with young talents has cropped up in every industry. In my opinion, not all the old workers should be replaced with young individuals.
Experienced employees of every industry should be considered as valuable assets. This is because their experience in the company would be definitely proportional to their loyalty and gratitude towards the employers which is an added advantage. Such Emotionally bonded employees would work sincerely for the development of the company. This is not all; their total experience could never be replaced by anything which implies that they would have sound practical knowledge. Therefore it is always better for the businesses to retain their older employees in spite of recruiting freshers.
On the other hand, fresh graduates are the need of the hour to make the industry sustain in the prevailing high competition. The world has become revolutionised with the advancements in technology and thus a people with cutting edge technical skills are needed in every industry for its economic growth.
Contrarily, it is not a wise decision to fire the old and experienced employees considering age as the only factor. Their experience should be valued, although they might not be aware of updated technologies. There would be problems wherein freshers could find difficulty. In this case, they certainly need guidance. Why can’t every industry use their senior employees as a mentor to train fresh trainees?
It should also be taken into consideration that an industry should be ruthless at times, in my opinion, to make its progress consistent. So if suppose a work like marketing and sales involves an old aged employee who is really getting weak, then the wisest decision would be to replace him or her with a young and energetic person. It is not that the older one should be fired but can be used as a resource person for the industry.
To conclude, both old and young employees are the prerequisites for a healthy work- environment. There should be a mutual sharing of knowledge and skills for the upliftment of the industry. But, few people whose age is an issue for their work could be replaced with young individuals and not all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-13 | manshu_d | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 82 | view |
- Some people choose a career according to the social status and salary it will give them. Others choose a career according to whether they will enjoy the work.Which do you think is the best way to choose a career? 61
- Safety standards are important when building people's homes. Who should be responsible for enforcing strict building codes – the government or the people who build the homes 73
- Nowadays on-line shopping has become more popular than in-store shopping. Is it a positive or a negative development? 89
- Some people say that in our modern age it is unnecessary to teach children about the skills of handwriting.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Excessive personal vehicles is an issue; hence government should envisage other means for commuters. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 473, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...y would have sound practical knowledge. Therefore it is always better for the businesses ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...very industry use their senior employees as a mentor to train fresh trainees? It...
^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and sales involves an old aged employee who is really getting weak, then the wis...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, then, therefore, thus, in my opinion, in spite of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06469002695 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85385815358 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522911051213 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3365862458 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.95 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.55 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303175112818 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923411864635 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734420689145 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170694253294 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702902115853 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.