The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
In recent years, the ever-increasing number of serious accidents have gradually been a subject of controversial concern. The question is how to alleviate the situation. Although some people think that the sole stricter punishments are the most tool for rising road safety, I argue that enhancing traffic safety is undertaken by many alternative measures not only imposing more punishments.
On the one hand, imposing harsh penalties on drivers who commit traffic laws can make significant contributions to improve the safety of traffic. For example, organizations in power can implement a wide variety of non-custodial sentences such as financial punishments and the confiscation of driving licenses on offenders. By doing this, a number of drivers with limited incomes would adhere to traffic rules because of the huge pressure of finance, which can minimize unpredictable and serious accidents. It is likely that the high level of punishments is one of the effective ways to develop traffic safety.
On the other hand, although heavy fines can be a great way to deter many motorists from driving dangerously and carelessly, sometimes the method can no bring desire effects. Therefore, the government and citizens should cooperate to find the best solution. Firstly, the authorities should invest more money and other resources in innovating the quality of traffic infrastructure and reduce the number of poor-quality vehicles, which can diminish a range of serious accidents caused by the huge number of transportations moving in the high level of density on the roads. Secondly, the development of commuter’s awareness should be high on the government agenda. As a result, reckless people driving while intoxicated would fall considerably and they would no longer pose a danger to other road-users.
In conclusion, although imposing stricter punishments on people committing traffic offences is a great way to develop road safety, the most effective method is the combination of various ways such as improving the quality of traffic road and human awareness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-09 | nguyen thi thu hien | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | nguyen thi thu hien | 73 | view |
- The world would be a much poorer place without colour To what extent would you agree or disagree 89
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Di 67
- for school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graphs show figures relating to hours worked and stress levels amongst professional in eight groups. Decribe the information shown to a university or collage lecturer. 73
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49375 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13508373094 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54375 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1381687511 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.230769231 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156129360786 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507204240207 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054550323956 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107768123406 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464526781564 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.