Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people sugar consumption, while others think that it is individual’s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
It is typically argued that the excessive intake of sugar ought to be controlled by government authorities, whereas others believe that sugar consumption in daily diet ought to be regulated at personal level. Through this essay, I shall discuss both the aspects and can justify why solely governments' efforts are more vital.
There are certain valid reasons because of which individuals tend to believe that higher authorities are answerable for reducing the use of sugar. Firstly, governments will impose significant taxes on the sugar items that ends up in restricted sale of those products. In Australia, as an example, it's been seen that whenever there is increase in the taxes on such products, people avoid them. Secondly, governments may organize awareness campaigns to teach public concerning the sick effects of sugar. A decent illustration for this is that a lot of individuals are influenced by such campaign programs initiated by officers on social media. Because of aforesaid reasons individuals have opinion that governments can take preventive measures to regulate sugar in daily use.
On the contrary, it's believed that regulation of sugar intake in diet is possible at the personal level. Everyone has his own metabolic rate and they understand their limitations how to manage the blood sugar level. For instance, an individual who consumes high sugar can regulate its concentration in the body by doing regular exercise. Additionally, to the present, by ever-changing routine diet set up and strict check on sugar intake, numerous diseases are often avoided. Hence, with the assistance of exercise and disciplined diet, sugar level within the body are often regulated. However, I believe, at present, these ways are troublesome to follow.
In conclusion, though sugar are often controlled by a proper workout and restricted use of sweet product, I powerfully believe that the legislative powers will play a polar role to cut back the consumption of sugar by imposing tax and awareness campaign. This could cause an effective measure to live a healthy life.
- Sugar is not good for health Some people think that government is responsible for limiting the consumption of sugar While others think that it is an individual who should be responsible for how much sugar he should eat Discuss both the views and give your 42
- Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people sugar consumption, while others think that it is individual’s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both view and 84
- Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people sugar consumption, while others think that it is individual’s responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both view and 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 642, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... initiated by officers on social media. Because of aforesaid reasons individuals have o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29696969697 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89636737748 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2327315116 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237816049022 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749943651676 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387486116909 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137623275668 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037728308353 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.