Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development?
In recent years, online social media are gaining a great deal of attention throughout the world. Most importantly, the issue has been a bone of contention among the critics regarding either the online socialization is really worthy or not. While some people will contend that these virtual networks are beneficial to the modern world, however, I would opine that these developments are having some serious negative impacts to the present world as well as to the future generations.
Firstly, for the sake of communication, people use the social networking platforms addictively and thus millions of productive hours are being wasted. What I mean here is that the general tendency is to spend hours after hours on social media mainly for watching other people’s update which is sometimes totally irrelevant to the actual need of communication. Hence, the purpose of communication is just an excuse for being glued on them irrespective of the surrounding atmosphere. People who are walking on the street of any downtown area can be used to exemplify the level of addition. It is not at all surprising to see that the people are trying stay online even while walking on the street like the zombie and as they are extensively suffering from “fear of missing out” or FOMO. The result is no good at all other than wasting tons of man-hour into certain unproductive issues.
Secondly, the booming of social networking is actually diminishing the moral values of face to face interaction to whom we are communicating. Hence, this sort of virtual communication does not help at all to develop any human intimacy or emotional bonding in these days. People are becoming heartless and becoming detached from the core circle of friends and family which results in loneliness in the real world. Surprisingly, to tackle that loneliness we are again finding peace on social platforms that results in a vicious cycle of dependency. Therefore, it is now becoming a common scenario in our everyday life to see that after coming back from the parents are rushing their attention to the social feeds and sometimes ignores that necessity of giving attention to their kids. Ultimately, the quality of life is being disrupted drastically weakening the family bonding forever.
All things considered, we are almost at the brink of extreme victimization of abusive online interfaces. To me, this will create an irreversible negative impact on our future generation unless we start thinking about a digital detox right now.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | wildhog.tejwani@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | wildhog.tejwani@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | ishpinder45 | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-06 | Sushil Dureja | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | itsshuvro | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 10
- Some people think money is the best gift to give to youngsters, while others disagree. Discuss both view and give you opinion. 73
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 11
- Some people say that industrial growth is necessary to solve poverty, but some other people argue that industrial growth is creating environmental problems and it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- You have received a job offer for a position you have wanted for a long time. You are expected to start on July 1st. However, you can only start a week later due to personal reasons. Write a letter to Mr. Jackson, your new boss. In your letter:•show you 49
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, hence, however, if, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, i mean, sort of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 409.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16381418093 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88813605257 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567237163814 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4366219873 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.235294118 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0588235294 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140043729449 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391001522334 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342558468481 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773464686942 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107235000373 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.