Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill. Do you agree or disagree?
Education is an important aspect in every student’s life. Couple of individuals say that schools and universities focus on teaching only theoretically and are hardly exposed to practical skills. I agree that instead of spending hours in classroom its essential to get real hand experience that is required in each person field of study.
Firstly, students spend most of their time listening to lectures and writing assignments. However, they don’t find enough opportunities to practice these learning in real life scenario. For instance, a medical college student won’t transform to a good surgeon unless he practices live surgery under his tutor’s supervision. Despite having all the knowledge on how to perform an operation, unless he has practical experience the student won’t become a good surgeon.
Secondly, some fields requires more practical skills with lesser importance for theoretical learning. Children who are interested in sport sports must spend more time on the field rather than spending in classrooms. Indeed, in today's education system we burden kids with unnecessary subjects that are of no use for them. For instance, a teenager whose ambition is of becoming cricketer is pressured to study subjects that are not relevant for him, since he requires more time on the field to improve his cricket skills. Therefore, it is vital to ascertain that how much knowledge is enough for a student who wants to become a sportsman.
In conclusion, it’s necessary that students must have basic education. Education levels should be ascertained on individual’s on what career they want to choose. A doctor and a sportsman don't require a same level of theoretical knowledge. Hence it depends on what each kid choose as their future and both theoretical and practical skills must be balanced so that they can relate and practice those which they learned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-23 | thu.le99 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | thu.le99 | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-21 | Lakshmi Prasanna jagarlamudi | 80 | view |
| 2019-03-21 | sharath957 | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-11 | nmily89 | 84 | view |
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time, and have health problems as a result.Why do so many working people not get enough exercise? What can be done about this problem? 73
- Many people believe that in order to have clean and tidy streets in their neighbourhood this should be the residents responsibility while others think it should be the government s duty What is your opinion 73
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that children should be taught to be competitive in school. Others, however, say that cooperation and team working skills are more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 67
- More and more people are opting for ready made food instead of freshly cooked food. Do this development has more advantage over disadvantage. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ant to choose. A doctor and a sportsman dont require a same level of theoretical kno...
^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... a same level of theoretical knowledge. Hence it depends on what each kid choose as t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and practice those which they learned.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38255033557 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98975021851 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614093959732 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5470587052 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134049236093 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436485453884 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329884469342 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759524300136 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00961296820772 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.