People have different views about whether the university students should choose the subjects that will be helpful for their future careers. While the vocational courses such as engineering, computer sciences may provide practical techniques in the working environment, I still believe that the interests of students are more important.
On the one hand, practical courses can be a great opportunity for students to earn skills needed by their future employers. During the lectures, teachers use real cases in the workplace to introduce the skills, students are encouraged to equip themselves with skills and experience during the assessments. The assessments given by teachers also help to build students’ self-confidence while forcing them to do the similar duties in their future careers. When students are seeking the internships or graduate jobs, those skills and confidence gain from the courses may benefit them in the competitive job interviews. Therefore, people may argue that students should be encouraged to study the job oriented subjects.
On the other hand, it is perhaps more important that students have the interest or passion in the subjects they choose. I believe that many students refuse to study the subjects that they do not like, which may even lead to poor academic results. For example, one of my classmates who do not have interest and basic science knowledge of science, he find that it is a nightmare for him to study engineering and cannot understand the skills taught by teachers. If students study subjects that they do not have interest, they would be reluctant to study and earn the knowledge. In my opinion, students should consider their preferences on the academic. Although some of the subjects like liberal art or philosophy do not provide skills that are applicable in workplace, those courses are crucial for the personal development and critical thinking.
In conclusion, I can understand why people may think vocational courses are helpful for students, but it seems to me that students should study whatever they like.
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
... basic science knowledge of science, he find that it is a nightmare for him to study...
^^^^
Line 5, column 660, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...r preferences on the academic. Although some of the subjects like liberal art or philosophy...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31914893617 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84440996453 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516717325228 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5982049916 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334697156166 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126087345887 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885324086481 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217427302854 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533525418865 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.