The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts illustrated the weight evaluation of citizen of Charlestown between the two years 2015 and 1955 through five age ranges by four categories underweight, ideal, overweight and obese.
Obviously, the ideal state reduced across almost age ranges except 20-29 in 2015. The most striking feature was the healthy weight percentage significantly decrease from nearly 50% in 1955 to only around 4.5% in 2015. By contrast, the figure of obese issue grew sharply. For the people in 30-39 years old, in 1955, the percentage of this category is 0%, while it rose to 10% in 2015. Especially, 60% of 60-69 years old resident has the obese issue in 2015, in comparison to 1955, this number was smaller than 12 times. The overweight issue also increased across all ages excluding 50-59, from about 10% in 1955 to only 3% in 2015. Similarly, there was a decrease for all groups in term of underweight assessment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | cindycornelia98 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | skan | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | fachryadul92 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | fachryadul92 | 67 | view |
- Internet Users as percentage of population 61
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph and table below give informatio about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- International migration in UK 56
- Computers are being used more and more in education and so there will soon be no role for the teacher in education. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 757.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91558441558 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63534783066 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9601559445 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.625 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14831180383 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612004802155 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445385321949 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125268800784 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00778067847656 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.