some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with.
what are the advantages and disadvantages for children of having a large number of toys?
It is often assumed that children need to have a great number of playthings because entertainment is an important part of childhood. I am personally inclined to believe that this popular notion has its own positive and negative points.
To begin with, the idea of praising children and buying them toys, especially every time they have an achievement at school, has many proponents. Most of the objects children these days plays with are puzzles, and they provide amusement for offspring and also contribute to children’s education, which reduces the burden on parents. Having countless toys would be justified on condition that they vary in terms of creating a situation that the child has to have more physical activity, leading to bettering physical health and strengthening their muscles. For example, a trampoline, which is highly valued as a gift, can be considered as a toy and encourages a lot of mobility.
However, there seems to be some drawbacks when a child has a lot of playthings. Firstly, so exciting and entertaining the playtime is that mostly there is no time for study and that can hinder the student’s progress. Secondly, designed to be played indoors, some toys reduce the mobility and might have adverse effects on physical well-being, increasing the risk of becoming obese. Thirdly, as some parents cannot afford a lot of toys, those children who have numerous objects might be considered as spoilt by their playmates either in their neighborhood or at school. Finally, too much exposure to the games can encourage the child to be self-centered and insensitive to others, which, in my view, may isolate him or her in the future.
Overall, provided that toys encourage more mental and physical activities, they can have a great influence on our next generation, and I would therefore maintain that children should only have enough of them as the number of objects defines the time needed, and sometimes, countless toys can have detrimental social impacts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-06 | Arash ghaseminia | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is often assumed that children need t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, well, as to, for example, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14769230769 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90887887877 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581538461538 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2474489265 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.416666667 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0833333333 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 7.06120827912 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295095383384 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965522677362 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641402238927 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171746248743 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471399269706 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.