transient lunar phenomena
The lecture and the reading passage both discussed about the causes of transient lunar phenomena, which is also known as TLPs. In the lecture, however, the professor casts doubt on hypotheses about cause of TLPs, which are described in the reading.
First, the lecturer argues that it seems gas is not the factor of occurring TLPs while the reading indicates that gathering of moon's gas are one of the reasons that affect the phenomena. To be more particular, the sites where TLPs occurred were far from where gas clouded and even gas is gathered, amounts of gas is too small to make phenomena.
Moreover, in contrast to the claim in the reading that reflected light from dust causes the TLPs, the professor insists it is hard to see that small particles are the phenomena because there is no indication that dust and TLPs are related. Furthermore, according to the researcher who visited Moon, it is hard to find dust in the lunar atmosphere.
Finally, according to the passage, activities from the Sun can affect making TLPs. However, the lecturer maintains that the claim about relationship of solar flare and Moon's phenomena is based on the insufficient data. In addition, from the results of data, period of solar cycle and Moon's activities are occasionally match.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'matched'.
Suggestion: matched
...e and Moons activities are occasionally match.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, moreover, so, while, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95794392523 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62237811448 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523364485981 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8608629691 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.571428571 110.228320801 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5714285714 21.698381199 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 7.06452816374 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193921812446 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822223701511 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612046490611 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113030948669 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632209568057 0.0443174109184 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.3589403974 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.