Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation
Having been considered as momentous factors contributing to sustainable development of a society, the internet, and public transportation are among rudimentary and interminable requisites of human beings in this advanced contemporary period. Governments always exert strenuous and enormous effort to pave the way for the triumph of their community members through allocating a considerable amount of money for people’s need. Owing to budget’s paramount importance on society’s headway, one of contentious questions among experts, which has inevitably heated controversy, is correlated with the fact that whether government accord higher primacy to The internet in order to assist people in boosting their knowledge via the internet or give due weighting to infrastructures such as enhancing public transportation. Generally, there does not a unanimous consensus toward this controversial issue since there exist numerous elements inextricably interwoven with one another. Yet popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling accede to this fact that the internet which has a dominant influence in all facets of our daily lives is better to be paid more heed. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into compelling reasons to elaborate my point of view.
The first exquisite point coming to my mind to cogently substantiate my standpoint concerned with this matter is that the internet is highly efficacious in broadening people’s knowledge scope due to the fact that it enables them to keep track of bang up-to-date science in their occupational environment. A country whose people are considerably left behind from other nations in accessing the internet in their workplace is incapable of providing people with the opportunity to elevate the levels of their standing in a nation-wide scale, let alone be a prosperous country. This is not a made up fact, it is based on a prima facie evidence drawn from an intelligible and comprehensive query conducted by University of Michigan indicated that the more rate of utilizing the internet in an institution or transaction is heightened, the likelihood of descending this society into anarchy may be alarmingly diminished as long as clients meticulously cultivate their skills required for modification of their job. Consistent with it, my experience as the budget allocator of an outstanding mill corroborate that spending money for accessing the internet is a long-term investment for both your own factory and of course your country.
Another equally pivotal point that should not underestimate is that although pessimistic detractors mention the negligible increasing efficiency of a country by ameliorating public transportation, they are not cognizant of promising interconnected changes can be established through the internet; the World Wide Net benefit people in manifold ways from such as amendment of public transportation. Advertisement for collaboration in governmental projects such as public transportation held through the internet can attract myriad of investors from diverse spots of a country, therefore, accumulated money through this avenue can be exploited in satisfactory objectives. On the trading grounds, marketplace advertising on the internet stimulates the growth of the country in an ineluctable degree, since costs in others aspects such as paper or need to use public transportation can be decreased since people can readily keep in touch through the internet and amount of unnecessary commutes will exponentially be leveled off.
On the medical grounds, educational classes such as mathematics or physics are associated with the right side of the human’s brain. Not utilizing left side of one’s brain exponentially diminish brain’s ability to stimulate nervous system properly in response to reactions contingent to the operation of the mind in a time of actions needs the involvement of two parts of the brain as long as just right part has been cultivated, let alone acquiring in-depth knowledge.
In brief, contemplating all aforementioned rationales, one soon realizes that pecuniary merits of accessing to the internet outweigh its demerits among which blossoming the awareness of people in their work environment and advertising government’s project through it stand out. Not only can the internet help people foster their talents in their field of expertise, but also the internet is a marked means to embrace high-quality services without the need for public transportation. Consequently, it is recommended that scholars and authorities employ corrective policies to the allocation of budget in favor of the internet, in turn ending up germinating society with well-educated generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: Worldwide
...e established through the internet; the World Wide Net benefit people in manifold ways fro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: Worldwide
...e established through the internet; the World Wide Net benefit people in manifold ways fro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, so, therefore, well, in brief, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 122.0 52.1666666667 234% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 29.0 8.0752688172 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4019.0 1977.66487455 203% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 708.0 407.700716846 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67655367232 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.15832040409 4.48103885553 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37367235376 2.67179642975 126% => OK
Unique words: 385.0 212.727598566 181% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543785310734 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 1261.8 618.680645161 204% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 39.0 20.1344086022 194% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.9058663151 48.9658058833 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 223.277777778 100.406767564 222% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 39.3333333333 20.6045352989 191% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183137902415 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060057348966 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280719910195 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988501490866 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443548745328 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.0 11.7677419355 212% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 14.97 58.1214874552 26% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.10430107527 260% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.9 10.1575268817 206% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.26 10.9000537634 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.01818996416 135% => OK
difficult_words: 236.0 86.8835125448 272% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 22.5 10.002688172 225% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.0537634409 175% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.