The layout demonstrates various stages undertaken in order to produce customer products and the way information is return to previous steps.
The layout demonstrates various stages undertaken in order to produce customer products and the way information is return to previous steps.
Overall, it is crystal clear that for producing consumer goods ten distinct steps are performed, while the acquired results are fed back to some preliminary stages.
Regarding the manufacturing process, the raw materials and manufactured components are stored together, before entering into the production planning. Alongside these stages, the product research and design are carried out and the results are used in the planning. After that, the assembly and inspection take place and the materials will be tested. Next, the tested products are packed and dispatched before getting ready for sale.
In terms of flow information, the sal data is used in the production planning and market research. The feedback of market research is employed for advertising, packaging, and design. Finally, the design and the storage steps receive feedbacks from testing and production planning respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-17 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 89 | view |
- In the new millennium, education and achieving a high score at schools is of paramount importance not only for the pupils but also for their parents. 61
- The bar chart demonstrates the proportion of British individuals donating part of their emolument to benevolent organizations in two different time span. 78
- It is true to say that the usage of fast food could contribute to devastating health problems 73
- The pie charts demonstrate the proportion of time spent by adolescents and senior citizens on the world wide web. 89
- It is claimed that living in a foreign nation who have different language could lead to devastating social and practical problems. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67948717949 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85877313308 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647435897436 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9789195412 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305158637184 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137928151746 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.305256864797 0.0843802449381 362% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283017776662 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.414036319653 0.0819641961636 505% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.