The chart compares seven different subjects in terms of the gender distribution of students successfully completing the high school capability test in the period 2010 - 2011.
Overall, female students surpassed their male counterparts in most area of study, making an exception of Geography.
Turning to the detail, 56.3% of girls passed Computing Science exams, compared to 42.1% of boys. Similarly, 16.1% more girls than boys achieved the Chemistry competency examination. The number of female students gaining achievement in Physics accounted for 25.6% of girls, while that of boys occupied 22.9%. An equivalent gap was observed in History, in which there was 25.6% of women and 22.9% of men succeeding in the test. The percentage of girls and boys relatively equally presented in Mathematics and Language results with a marginal difference, of merely 0.8% and 0.6% respectively.
Conversely, male students were better in Geography than female ones. Approximately a third of boys accomplished Geography exams, which was 10.3% higher than the recorded number of girls.
- The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The table below gives information about the employment sectors in which people from 3 age groups worked 84
- The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 73
- The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, similarly, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 144.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61111111111 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.46410161514 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94092449085 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.680555555556 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0160461642 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181202098796 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658269774447 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084701952946 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117114102961 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105073747509 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.