The chart compares various subjects in terms of the gender distribution of students successfully completing the high school capability test in the period 2010 - 2011.
Overall, female students surpassed their male counterparts in most area of study, making an exception of Geography. Furthermore, the outcomes of Computing Science, Mathematics and Foreign Languages were the highest among seven subjects.
Turning to the detail, 56.3% of girls passed Computing Science exams, resulting in a disparity of 14.2%, compared to 42.1% of boys. Meanwhile, the competency in Mathematics and Foreign Languages were relatively equal between girls and boys, with a marginal difference, of merely 0.8% and 0.6% respectively. In comparison with Computing Science, despite a much lower result, Chemistry witnessed a similar gap between female and male competency, in which 16.1% more girls than boys achieved examination. The number of female students gaining achievement in Physics accounted for 25.6% of girls, while that of boys occupied 22.9%. An equivalent gap was observed in History, with 25.6% of women and 22.9% of men succeeding in the test.
Conversely, male students were better in Geography than female ones. Approximately a third of boys accomplished Geography exams, which was 10.3% higher than the recorded number of girls.
- The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001. 84
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 79
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 11
- The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998. 78
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, furthermore, if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63917525773 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97124505434 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634020618557 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8740991771 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140372354121 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528676804127 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809263355393 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104127339064 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105738799384 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.