The given line graph illustrates the quantity of goods transported by four means of transport namely road, water, rail, pipeline in the given time period from 1974 to 2002. The data has been calibrated in million tonnes.
It is quite evident from the graph that all modes of transport became popular for transporting goods with the increasing years except rail which remained alomst same. In 1974, the goods transported by water and pipeline were 40 million tonnes and 5 million tonnes respectively. After that, from 1978, both the modes of transport followed the same pattern while transporting goods and remained similar till 1990 where the goods transported were 60 million tonnes and nearly 25 million tonnes by same means of transport.It followed by sharp decrease in use of water mode of transport and reached at 30 million tonnes in 1998 whereas quantity of goods tranported by pipeline remained same till the year 2002 where it was 20 million tonnes.
Moving further, quantity of goods transported by rail system was 40 million tonnes in 1974 and it was noticed similar till the year 2002 with minor fluctuations in bwtween. The road system became popular throughout given time period where the goods transported went from 70 million tonnes to nearly about 100 million tonnes at the end of the year 2002.
Overall, it is clear that usage of all modes transport were in increasing trend except rail.
- The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand. 67
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 56
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 67
- the graph below shows the quantity of goods transported in the uk between 1974 and 2002. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...o 2002. The data has been calibrated in million tonnes. It is quite evident from th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...llion tonnes by same means of transport.It followed by sharp decrease in use of wa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02553191489 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51112148253 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459574468085 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 116.028013859 43.030603864 270% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 147.625 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.375 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263958880451 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138944983764 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852871293628 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180371514186 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800458751962 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.