animal fossils usually provide little opportunity to study the actual fossil tissues
Scientists are excited for finding a 70-million-year-old fossil of a genre of dinosaur called T.rex which may contain the remains of the actual tissues of the animal. The reading provides us with three identifications to demonstrate the state. However, the professor in the lecture points out that all the three identifications are skeptical in the reading.
First off, the passage says that the leg bone of the fossil contains many branching channels which may be the hollows where blood vessels were once placed. But the professor casts doubt about this. She says that the the channels may not necessarily be the hollows, it may be something else. Since the research was happened long after the dinosaur has dead, there may be many bacteria inside the bone. So the channels may be some organic materials residues which were made by the bacteria.
Furthermore, the article supports that the leg bone of the fossil may contain the red blood cells because some spheres are found in the inner bone. Again, the professor do not agree this, she refutes that some identical vessels were found in the other fossils in the same place, and such vessels have been proved that they did not have any red blood cells. So the T.rex's fossil cannot be the remains of the red blood cells, too. And the professor argues that they may be the remains of the pieces of minerals.
Last but not least, the article claims that collagen may be contained in the leg bone. However, the professor disagrees this. She says that the collagen can only last 100 thousand years. They can not last long years. But the bone has over 700 millions years old, which is contracted to they truth. Consequently, the professor points out that the collagen does not come from T.rex. And it may much more like come from some recent resources, such as humans.
In a nutshell, from what has been discussed above, the professor thinks what has been stated in the reading are skeptical.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-04-23 | RusssellWestbrook | 3 | view |
- It is better to work for business owned by someone else than to work for the business of one s own family 87
- Torreya taxifoha 73
- animal fossils usually provide little opportunity to study the actual fossil tissues 3
- physical exercise is important to older people than to young people 44
- Which area the government should fund to improve children s education 1 hiring more teachers to teach in a small class 2 preschool education before kindergarten 3 providing some training courses so that teachers can be more professional 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...r casts doubt about this. She says that the the channels may not necessarily be the hol...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...r casts doubt about this. She says that the the channels may not necessarily be the hol...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 335.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80298507463 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49635778347 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486567164179 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2985327071 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.45 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 7.06452816374 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0882330352576 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0258318623093 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439529833463 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0525288008582 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550026359898 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.