The importance of radical sports for health, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of dangers sports has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on accepting this sort of sports in

Essay topics:

The importance of radical sports for health, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of dangers sports has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on accepting this sort of sports in competitions in recent years. It can be agreed that people who used to pratic those radical sports is because they love adrenaline. This essay will elaborate how it may be acceptable and how it may be not allowed and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

At the outset, there are numerous reasons why people still investing in secure equipment, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that skiing and water rafting are danger sports and should be prohibited. As an illustration, a University of Adelaide study has shown that 79% of people that enjoy through those sports that require more adrenaline are fearless and braves than others. Therefore, the health law that rules this kind of sport wants to guarantee that they could become safe for who practice.

Another key justification for upholding this notion is that secure equipment must be wear for all athletes including helmet, gloves and necessary items. For instance, for rafting, all participants must wear a helmet, gloves, life jacket, and etc. Hence this type of sport could not be taken out of competitions.

From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the importance of secure equipment for those sports are essential and is prominent, and it should not be overlooked.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-04-24 daniellima126 55 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user daniellima126 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ust wear a helmet, gloves, life jacket, and etc. Hence this type of sport could not be t...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, so, still, therefore, for instance, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 31.9359605911 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 1207.87684729 70% => OK
No of words: 165.0 242.827586207 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12727272727 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.92707691288 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68229579722 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 139.433497537 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.660606060606 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 379.143842365 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6551724138 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4308891144 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230870422461 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109041753022 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523999272157 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147856136422 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405127890822 0.0609392437508 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 55.0591133005 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.