1. Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The author of issue adduces that there are two different perspectives toward the duty of corporations. While there is a school which emphasizes the well-being of people, another group highlight the higher amount of income in the scope of the defined writ. In what follows, I will list the possible reasons as supporting factors for both views, and finally, I will posit my stand.
The group, which lists the well-being and satisfaction of the societies and environment, has a wider perspective toward the issue. Since there is a direct and cogent link between the type of services and people lifestyle. A better service is equal to the well-being of consumers. For instance, an example of a food industry firm could shed a light for the clarification of this issue. If this firm produces the healthy food which is nutrition, organic, besides, its production processes are done with the fewer interaction with nature, the outcome will be the mentally and physically healthy people who live in a winsome place. This instance illustrates the effect of the production and services provided by the firm on individuals’ life from various factors.
As mentioned, there is another outlook toward the issue too which believes that the high economic income is the vital responsibility of the corporation. This group solely considers the firm and its benefits. Since one of the main goals of each organization, the establishment is earning money; in addition, the higher income leads to the enhancement and promotion of the organization. Indeed, according to a noteworthy, recently released research by the Psychological Department of Tehran University, there is a direct relation between the amount of income, and human being’s motivation for work and productivity. Therefore, by consideration of this research outcome, this group weighs the main amount of earn to chases the initial goal of the organization which is earning the money.
I should say that this the first group with which I largely concur. First of all, the rearing reason for this group is a logical and plausible one. Furthermore, I have more two reasons for my side-selection. Firstly, the sense of satisfaction provided by the great services of the firm leads to the higher income for the firm too. As the consumer receives a great function from an organization, he is willing to pay more money, since he considers this as the encouragement. Consequently, the higher income follows the well-being provided by the well-service of the firm. Secondly, the first viewpoint possesses a benefit in the national scope. The happy and satisfied people who have fewer problems; thus, they are more effective in their own personal task too.
To wrap it up, although the earning higher money is crucial for the survival of the organization, responding to the satisfaction and well-being of denizens is more beneficial than it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Ulka1999 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | fugitate | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | underwoodkats1 | 54 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 718, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'chase'.
Suggestion: chase
...group weighs the main amount of earn to chases the initial goal of the organization wh...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2427.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1858974359 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06678276253 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 752.4 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3497956402 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.52173913 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.347826087 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04347826087 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143442577879 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420554277386 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042279632207 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746392671362 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208066329551 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.