If you were an employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire: an inexperienced worker at a lower salary or an experienced worker at a higher salary? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
In recent times, there has been a widespread debate on the way that people should choose the best fit for any job position. Personally, If I had the chance to hire an employee who has experience with another one who does not have, I would choose the person who has experience in the work field regardless of the salary.
To begin with, people with perfect experience can improve work quality in a short time. Most of them come with very creative ideas about improving the work environment because they have encountered several thoughts in the previous work experience. For example, when my wife Rana started to work in Edgewood Pharmacy in Jacksonville Florida, the workflow was very slow. However, she was able to make a huge change in the pharmacy because the creative ideas that she learned from her previous work experiences. She came up with the idea of text messages that allow patients to take a photo for the prescription before he/she comes to the pharmacy. Thus, patients will come to the pharmacy and immediately pick his medications without waiting for a long time. This perfect solution improved the workflow in the pharmacy and it improved the quality of work by reducing the errors that might happen when pharmacists prepare prescriptions on the rush while the patient is waiting outside.
Adding to the previous point, when people hire an experienced worker, they will save a lot of money. Inexperienced employees need extensive training programs for at least one year. These programs are highly expensive because many experts come and do the training for the new employees. Therefore, most companies will lose a lot of money when they hire inexperienced employees because they have to give a high salary for experts and they have to spend many on training materials. On the other hand, experienced employees cost the company less money than any training programs.
In conclusion, I encourage people to hire experienced worker rather than the worker who do not have any knowledge and experience about the field.
- Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- If you were the president of the United State, which of the following would you choose to do, and explain why. 1) build more schools,2) provide more funding for public transportation3) create more public parks. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99705014749 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68545797743 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536873156342 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4471551094 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.933333333 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102948290101 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374169123518 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059008201915 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828795616375 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593664551206 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.