The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016.
The maps illustrate the alterations of Liverpool John Moores University between 2010 and 2016. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the replacement of the road which connected the south to the west of the university.
To begin with the north side of the university, the buildings of biology, chemistry and physics, which were located in the north part of the university, were converted into science building in 2016. Moreover, in 2016, the place of the library remained unchanged, nevertheless, the function of it was extended to become library and IT Suite, and to the south of new science building, the position of the car park and the road had been replaced by new lecture theatre in 2016.
In accordance with the south part of the university, 2010 to 2016 witnessed the alterations of the footpaths which changed the place of admin building and the road in 2010, as well as the admin building was moved just beside the new lecture theatre. According to the opposite of the admin building, there were a new bus station and a new café which modified the car park and the road place in previous time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | Milan karki | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Milan karki | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | jignesh.ghelani | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | jignesh.ghelani | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | alifdores | 73 | view |
- The range of technology is increasing the gap between the poor and the rich do you agree or disagree 32
- The line graph below shows the money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria. 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people.Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them. 73
- Line graph Consumption of fast food by Australian teenagers 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80303030303 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64178107423 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484848484848 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.3418502276 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.5 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 5.23603664747 223% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19733195181 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133102125603 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.186659217479 0.0843802449381 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165776630023 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131091862123 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.