In recent years, prioritizing the selection criteria for the recruitment process has been gaining a great deal of attention among the corporate world. Most importantly, it has been a bone of contention among the HR personnel and other recruitment agencies regarding the importance of innovativeness as well as proactive attitudes in the job environment. While some critics consider choosing the stereotypical under-command for their team, I would contend that for dynamism and future growth, idea-generating brain with self-initiative approach should be prioritized.
On the one hand, it is inevitable that innovation brings a better future for any company, therefore, for a sustainable upward trajectory, brainstormer should be hired. This will, in turn, help the company to build new ideas with more revenue generating structures. Moreover, the candidates who are creative-minded, also possess an innate ability to develop leading capacity. This happens because everyone surrounding him including his reporting authority will start depending on his skills once identified as a fruitful one. In an empirical survey conducted in London by the Ministry of Labor and Industry ascertained that 87% of the candidate who was chosen at different positions based on their higher IQ and creativity, brought a drastic change in company’s profitability. Most surprisingly, they had a better career growth in the same organization with a high level of leading designations.
Conversely, some critics admittedly suggest that candidates must be of team performer and follower in nature. Hence, the chemistry between the teammates becomes stronger and the interpersonal relationship goes beyond imagination. This results in a good working environment and fosters a healthy atmosphere for both the employee and the employer. Moreover, the subordinates who follow the instructions of superiors, ensures a better-organized working environment with minor chance of error in the workflow. The sales team of Johnson and Johnson can be the best illustration for this type of well-organized and fine-tuned as well as the result-oriented environment. It is not surprising to see that everyone follow a strong chain of command and ensures the best outcomes for their team, which was featured in Forbes magazine last year.
To recapitulate, the best selection depends on the actual need of the employer. To me, the innovativeness brings more positive attributes to the organizations rather than an old-fashioned boss-subordinate relationship, where meeting profitability matters mostly.
- You have been invited to attend an interview for a place studying a course in a college. Unfortunately, because of a previous appointment, you cannot come at the time they wish.Write a letter to the admissions tutor. In your letter• explain your positi 84
- You have received a job offer for a position you have wanted for a long time You are expected to start on July 1st However you can only start a week later due to personal reasons Write a letter to Mr Jackson your new boss In your letter show you 70
- You recently bought an item of clothing from a shop. You discovered that it had a fault and returned it to the shop for replacement or refund. However, the assistant told you that this was against the store's policy.Write a letter to the store manager, ex 84
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 36
- You recently bought an item of clothing from a shop. You discovered that it had a fault and returned it to the shop for replacement or refund. However, the assistant told you that this was against the store's policy.Write a letter to the store manager, ex 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ng structures. Moreover, the candidates who are creative-minded, also possess an innate...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70572916667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47022674865 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619791666667 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6180251254 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.882352941 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5882352941 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137940083773 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389504812848 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308625348256 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722984407915 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355718595574 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.