Government should spend money to encourage sports and arts in school children, rather than on professional sports and art performance for general public.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no doubt that sports and arts play a very crucial role in the development of a nation. While it is opined that, council authorities should motivate school children to learn sports and art activities, however, they should not encourage the professional aspect of these skills. I do not completely agree with either of these perspectives and will support my explanation with relevant examples.
On the one hand, students should be encouraged to participate in these skills for their growth and development. This is because, learners should have the autonomy to choose, which help them to acknowledge new dimensions of their life. For example, according to a report published by the UK newspaper in 2011, highlighted the neurocognitive development of these students who were involved in skills like sports or arts (music, painting, dancing). In contrast, strict supervision should be done on children so that they do not overindulge and lose concentration from academics. As a result, they would perform mediocrely in both aspects of life.
On the other hand, I believe Bureaucrats should motivate the professional aspect of these skills. The reason is that, it would create a sense of patriotism as well as generate revenue, which would help in boosting the economy of a country. For instance, in my own experience, I am a professional tennis player and have received tremendous accolades and financial benefits due to this. As a result, I donate this amount for the welfare of my state. However, athletes should not exploit this gift for their personal benefits.
Therefore, I believe whether these skills are encouraged at school or professional level, personality and environmental factors play an important role in choosing how to utilize these gifts.
In conclusion, while it is beneficial to encourage school learners to learn sports and arts, I believe it should also be promoted professionally to lead them to a path of success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-16 | nehatshahi | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | nehatshahi | 73 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The chart shows the percentage of drugs taken by girls and boys in a school in New Zealand.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at l 61
- The government should spend money to encourage sports and arts in school children rather than on professional sports and art performance for the general public To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowadays it is possible to move ocean creatures from their natural habitat at sea and have them relocated in amusement parks for the purpose of people s recreation Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages Explain your rea 89
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22292993631 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04044570976 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544585987261 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9447067703 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247217839904 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792402342263 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601526282784 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139450882866 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688042112416 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.