The graph above shows the radio and television audience throughout the day in 1982.
The figure elucidates the number of two media’s audiences in a day in 1982. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the amount of television audiences.
To begin with, there was a gradual palpitation in the total of television audiences from 6.00 a.m., which made up at 0, to 10.00 a.m., which constituted at well below a tenth. Unexpectedly, the percentage of television audiences experienced a dramatic growth in the next 10 hours to peak at well over two-fifths in 8.00 p.m., nevertheless, it plunged tremendously in the following 10 hours, dropping to well less than 10% by the end of the period shown.
In accordance with radio audiences, 6.00 a.m. to 8.00 a.m. witnessed a significant upsurge in the amount of radio audiences where it, initially, stood at just beneath two-twentieths and soared to well beyond two-tenths at 10.00 a.m.. Unfortunately, it plummeted tremendously between 10.00 a.m., which was at a fifth, and 6.00 a.m. in the next day, which accounted approximately for 2%.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make?Has this been a positive or negative development? 73
- The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016. 67
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 56
- Leaders and directors in an organization are frequently older people. Some people think younger leaders would be better.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Bar chart : UK telephone calls, by category, 1995 – 2002. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...d to well beyond two-tenths at 10.00 a.m.. Unfortunately, it plummeted tremendousl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09356725146 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14710089462 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4009561422 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.166666667 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135620287764 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841278374196 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547680091725 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112289993244 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044536722215 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.