It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public.
Political leaders often hold critical information that can be misused by an ignorant and cynical people to possibly harm others. Since the population of any society or nation contains all kinds of people, from poor laborers to elite businessmen, criminals to intellectuals, sinners to altruists, it is, therefore, crucial for political leaders to be very careful before letting critical information out to the public. They must make careful considerations of all the implications of publicizing the information. There are many examples in history where keeping some critical information secret has saved the world from severe damage and conflicts.
Alan Turing was a genius English computational mathematician during the times of World War II. He was assigned to decipher the German Nazi communication messages encrypted by Enigma, the most sophisticated encrypting technology of that time. He did manage to decrypt the messages and, eventually, went on to control the war as such to end it quickly. The British government did not let anyone else have a slightest clue that Turing was involved in orchestrating the war. Had others known about his role, the Nazis would have adapted their communication methods and the world now would be under the cold-hearted dictatorship of the Nazis. The British government only publicized Turing’s role 50 years after his death. This is an example of how keeping critical information secret is sometimes better for the world.
People might argue that this is against the right to information, against democracy. I’m not saying all information should be kept secret and the public should know nothing; general information should be publicly available of course, but there are some mission-critical information that is better withheld from public until careful considerations are done of all its implications. Ideally, critical information should be concealed from public in such a way that they are not even aware that any such information exists in the first place. If, however, someone asks for it with justifiable reasons, then the political leaders should provide to them confidentially.
One can imagine a world where nothing is secret and everything is public. That would be a chaotic world where nothing is under control. It is necessary to withhold some critical information until it is appropriate to be publicized. It is, however, necessary to publicize everything eventually. Otherwise, people would not learn from history and could repeat it instead. There is a saying, “If some lies bring people together, it’s not a bad thing.”. And it applies to politics and leadership as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | hyein | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | kotharu2006 | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...government did not let anyone else have a slightest clue that Turing was involved...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, of course, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2249.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41927710843 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08855697806 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549397590361 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 62.9839281612 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.227272727 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8636363636 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68181818182 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271308414828 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690810099625 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673069559234 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166945602853 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923618088992 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.