In many countries, old or traditional languages are dying out or being forgotten, especially be younger people, is this an acceptable development which occurs inevitably, or is it something which we shohuld try to prevent?
With the urbanization and globalization boom, some traditional dialects are not using anymore in favor to wide-spreaded languages. In my essay, I will try to analyse whether we could take it as certainty, or try to avoid neglecting language diversity.
On the one hand, with more and more people moving from rural areas, where dialects still exist, the need for these dialects demeans, as there are less native speakers leave. Those who move to urban areas, don’t need the language of their ancestors for day-to-day interaction. Moreover, these families foster their children in a new language environment, which means that languages not being handing over to new generations. It might not cause any harm neither for society nor for individuals in terms of their financial, physical or social condition.
On the other hand, though, language is closely linked to the culture and history of any folk. Thus, losing a language or dialect, we as a nation could lose a meaningful part of our cultural and historical heritage. This could be compared with a loss of Russian traditional performances with the skomorokhs, which was the most popular entertainment in pre-revolutionary Russia. Furthermore, the abundance of people’s culture and neglecting minority languages, people would probably devolve cultural diversity, which enriches our society. It would be a sour world without legends of aboriginal habitats of Siberia or America. Taking into account these aspects, it could worth trying to protect the linguistical diversity on our planet.
To summarize, it appears that while the lower usage of some unique dialects might be perceived as an inevitable consequence of modern life, the linguistic and cultural diversity could be a meaningful reason for trying to preserve endangered languages.
- Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. How far do you share this viewpoint? 73
- Some people say that the Internet is responsible for destroying social skills of teenagers and young adults.Why do you think the Internet is seen as dangerous in this way and what can we do to ensure that it does not harm the social development of teenage 78
- Crime appears to be rising in most countries in the world, especially among young people. Identify the possible causes of this trend, and propose some solutions you think would be effective. 78
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 61
- You have lost your student identification card. This has created some problems for you.Write a letter to the director of student services. In your letter•advise them of your situation•explain how this is affecting you•request a new cardYou do NOT ne 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43060498221 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0509077576 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612099644128 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8100806055 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.384615385 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168238598698 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057829826795 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476233891029 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102342907913 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02537145162 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.