The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Technology has been increasing over the globe nowadays. A recent few decades are witness of developing in technology sector. Amid this development, there is one phenomenon that has associated with it. According to phenomenon, faction of outfits believe that mobile phones has been banned as smoking in certain places while other argue that it should not be done. I will try to throw light upon a pros and cons of mobile phones. As well as I will try posit my perspective about it.
To commence with, there are multifarious reason to shore the view of prohibition of usage of mobile phone in some places. The primary reason is distraction through the cell phones. To Justify. Since, people who use station, they can lose their attention from work or study. Consequently, they get worse result. Furthermore, the second demerits of usage of mobile phone is disintegration between the family. To be precise, in recent time people use this device all time without interact with other people face to face. Thereby, people may have to be suffered from less relation with family members.
On the other side of spectrum, there are plethora advantages of mobile phones. The first main reason is that cell phones have more benefits like they have some important features or apps. They may use the maps to reach their destination without having any curb. The second reason for using cellphone is to interact with family members who stay away from home. To explain, while students or people who give abroad for their study or work, they access the mobile phones to communicate with family members through making a phone call or even video call which tend to make convenient for people to overcome the problem of feeling home-sickness.
Aggelomerating, all the points to conclude that mobile phones have more pros for people as well as community outweigh the cons. But from my perspective, cell should be used in proper way without having adverse affect of mobile phones.
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. 78
- The table below gives information about UK independent films. 11
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries. 67
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 78
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98480243161 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58585275192 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547112462006 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.1492998313 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.45 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216922232475 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593915819939 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728945773023 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14222154016 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262416641142 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.