Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of
the subject being taught.
Use specifc reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words.
Do not use memorized examples.
Almost everybody is able to remember special teachers from the past even if they are from their childhood. We probably can not remember the subject in detail that they taught us but we may remember the valuable advice and the way that they related to the class. The main function of educators is to detect the challenges of their students finding the right approach to help them to overcome it. For this reason, I am convinced that the ability to get along with students is more important than just posses deep knowledge about an issue.
It is agreed that teaching is to exchange wisdom, performing this requires specific skills. Having knowledge is not sufficient, the professor should be committed, punctual, reasonable, creative, dedicated, organized and patient. Moreover, they should communicate, instruct and inspire through a confident relation. For example, everybody has already had teachers and thought that they know the subject but do not know how to transfer it. It is due to the inability to relate well with the students and understand their limitations.
It is expected that you perform your job with expertise in all areas and all professions which include teachers. Being the leading authority in the subject does not make a great educator. The ability to communicate well and relate with others, however, will indicate the best educators. They possess qualities and knowledge not just in academic view but they will inspire their students in life. Good values such as respect and commitment are taught by them.
Furthermore, when educators perform an excellent job they obtain the respect of the class, hence generating a pleasant environment. Consequently, the process of learning will be enhanced and considerable skills will be developed and improved in class. In conclusion, there are many qualities necessary to be an excellent professor but I believe that the most important is to have a special relationship with their students.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 76
- TPO - writing integrated taskSummarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage - Turtle Excluder Device (TED) 86
- TOEFL integrated writing Chevalier de Seingalt 70
- Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world Use reasons and details to support your opinion 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 316.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22151898734 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80374746362 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563291139241 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9057980358 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.0588235294 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268583403077 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744743176257 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533058595048 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15446392057 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259126342763 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.